ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2024
Decoupling Intrinsic Metal Ion Reduction Rates from Structural Outcomes in Multimetallic Nanoparticles.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accessible Chemical Benchmarking of Nanoparticle Growth Using Oxidation-Reduction Potential Sensors.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- High-Entropy Alloy Nanocrystals: From Synthesis to Characterization and Catalytic Application.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Real-Time Electroanalytical Measurements of Dynamic Reaction Chemistry Provide Generalizable Mechanistic Considerations for Metal Nanoparticle Synthesis.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Structural peculiarities of the silver-containing nanocomposites based on carboxymethyl cellulose-chitosan polyelectrolyte complexes and their antimicrobial and antiviral applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using Electrochemistry to Benchmark, Understand, and Develop Noble Metal Nanoparticle Syntheses.ACS nanoscience Au · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simultaneously controlling both stoichiometry and atom arrangement during the synthesis of multimetallic nanoparticles is often challenging, especially when the desired metal precursors exhibit large differences in their intrinsic reduction kinetics. In such cases, traditional synthetic methods often lead to the formation of exclusively phase-segregated structures. In this study, we demonstrate that the relative reduction kinetics of the metal precursors can be manipulated independently of their intrinsic differences in reduction rates by modulating the instantaneous concentrations of the metal cation precursors. We achieve this control by adjusting the precursor addition rate, which decouples chemical ordering outcomes from differences in precursor reduction kinetics. To guide these experiments, we describe a quantitative model to determine how metal ion reduction rates evolve with variations in the precursor addition rate and thereby predict optimal conditions for the synthesis of multimetallic nanoparticles with precise structural and compositional outcomes. We demonstrate the efficacy of this model experimentally by synthesizing both core@shell and alloyed nanoparticles with stoichiometric control using the same metal ion precursors in two different bimetallic systems (Au-Pd and Au-Pt) as well as in a quinary metal system (Co, Ni, Cu, Pd, and Pt). This approach enables the design of nanoparticle architectures independent of intrinsic differences in metal ion reduction potentials of the constituent metals while maintaining both stoichiometric and structural control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.