ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2025
Core elements of the perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) model of care.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A survey among geriatricians on geriatric oncology and geriatric surgical oncology models in Europe.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Contemporary preoperative assessment for colorectal surgery: new insights and developments.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Review
- In-hospital outcomes of older patients with gastric cancer and their risk factors: large comprehensive institution-based study.European geriatric medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHospital surgical services that utilise the approach of the perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) model of care improve outcomes for older people contemplating and undergoing surgery. Complex models of care like POPS may be difficult to implement without understanding the elements that comprise that model of care. Logic models can be used to aid implementation by visually depicting theoretical relationships between the elements of the model of care. Our objective was to understand the core elements of the POPS model of care at health services other than where it was first developed.
methodsA qualitative case study at three contextually different health services in England with POPS models of care of varying implementation maturity was undertaken. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians and managers involved in POPS (n = 56). The interviews were analysed using inductive and deductive methods.
resultsWe developed a logic model with seven domains and themes that described the core elements of the POPS model of care compared and contrasted across the three health services. We found POPS could be adapted to 'fit' the local contexts of our study and still achieve its desired outcomes if it remained true to the principles of comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimisation and was delivered by staff with expert skills and attitudes.
conclusionOur logic model provides potentially generalisable information about the core elements of the POPS service in three health services. This information can be used to aid the implementation of the POPS model of care in healthcare settings similar to our study. Further research may be required to test the logic model in other healthcare contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39654009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.