ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Older Adults' Experiences of Emergency Department Admission Decisions: A Qualitative Study in a Public Safety Net Hospital.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated with Emergency Department Utilization among Older Black Adults with Chronic Illness in the United States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Drivers of Frequent Emergency Department Use in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHospital admission is a significant event in the healthcare trajectory of older adults (age 60 +). Numerous harms such as delirium, falls, and adverse medication events can arise that outweigh the benefits of admission. Little is known about how older adults feel about being hospitalized or what they think admission will achieve for them. These issues are particularly important to understand in socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, who have poor access to outpatient care and higher hospitalization rates.
methodsWe performed semi-structured interviews with emergency department (ED) patients aged 60 and older who were being admitted. The study site was a public hospital serving a socioeconomically disadvantaged, predominantly Hispanic and Black patient population. Interviews focused on experiences of the admission decision, expectations of hospitalization, and health outcome goals. We coded data using an inductive approach.
resultsTwenty-seven older adults were interviewed about their experiences. Most participants belonged to minoritized racial or ethnic groups (70%, n = 19), and 41% (n = 11) spoke Spanish as their primary language. Approximately one-third were admitted for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, i.e., conditions that can be managed in the outpatient setting to prevent hospitalization. Four themes emerged: (1) participants felt that clinicians made admission decisions for, rather than with, them; (2) participants sought to avoid admission due to family caregiving and work obligations; (3) participants with chronic conditions viewed their admission as resulting from poor access to care over the longer term; (4) participants expected hospitalization to improve their chronic symptom burden, mobility, and abilities to perform activities of daily living.
conclusionsOlder adults' expectations of hospitalization exceed stabilization of acute illness. Hospital admission of older adults presents an opportunity for shared decision-making and communication about likely outcomes of hospitalization. Incorporating patient-centered outcomes into admission decisions may help align care with older adults' priorities in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.