ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Utilizing Quality Improvement Methodology to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Between Faculty and Resident Physicians.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health system data from a large academic medical center revealed a 14% lower rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in resident patient panels compared to faculty patient panels. This resident-led quality improvement (QI) work identified causes for disparities in CRC screening and implemented an innovative panel management intervention to reduce CRC screening disparities. Analysis was conducted across two academic primary care clinics at a single institution. Residents engaged key stakeholders in the CRC screening process to identify causes for disparities and potential solutions in the CRC screening process. A novel interprofessional panel management protocol was implemented to guide residents on how to perform population health strategies to increase CRC screening and to streamline the navigation process. The effectiveness of each intervention in improving CRC screening was analyzed. After four months of protocol implementation, CRC screening for resident patient panels improved from 62 to 68% based on analysis done on a run chart. The difference in CRC screening between faculty and resident patient panels decreased from 14 to 10%, reducing the disparity by 29%. This interprofessional panel management protocol significantly increased the CRC screening rates among patients receiving primary care from resident physicians. This further highlights the importance of multipronged interventions to improve disparities in CRC screening and to improve overall screening rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.