SynthesisOral radiology2025
The effectiveness of fractal analysis in diagnosing temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review of clinical studies.
Synthesis in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fractal analysis in dentistry: a bibliometric analysis (1991-2024).Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Masseter Muscle Thickness and Mandibular Trabecular Complexity: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Evaluation of TMJ bone microarchitecture in malocclusion and tooth loss using fractal dimension analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Condylar Bone Quality in Growing Children Is Associated With Genetic Polymorphisms in Genes Involved in Calcium and Phosphate Maintenance.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Comparative fractal analysis of mandibular condyles in temporomandibular disorder and non-temporomandibular disorder patients using cone-beam computed tomography.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the application and effectiveness of fractal analysis (FA) in assessing temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) with dental imaging.
methodsThis systematic review, conducted in adherence to PRISMA-P and Cochrane Handbook guidelines, involved a comprehensive search of five electronic indexed databases up to September 15, 2024. The thorough search aimed to ensure the inclusion of all relevant studies on dental imaging with fractal dimension (FD) analysis for TMDs. The risk of bias was performed using the revised QUADAS 2 tool.
resultsOut of 342 studies retrieved, 15 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. These studies comprised 7 retrospective and 8 prospective nonrandomized clinical studies. Various imaging modalities were used including panoramic, CT, CBCT, and MRI. Most studies reported significantly lower FD values in TMD patients than in controls suggesting FD analysis' potential for detecting early TMJ degenerative changes. However, a few studies did not find significant differences or lacked control groups, highlighting the variability in findings across the research. The overall risk of bias was high regarding the applicability of all included studies.
conclusionThe fractal dimension (FD) analysis of dental images shows potential as a valuable tool for detecting early degenerative changes in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). It could enhance diagnostic efficiency by providing additional insights from routine radiographs. However, the variability in findings and methodologies underscores the need for further research to validate and standardize these techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39653954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.