ArticleExperimental brain research2024
Implicit contributions to dual visuomotor adaptation.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to seamlessly switch between different visuomotor mappings is critical for effective interactions in a dynamic environment. This experiment aimed to establish the contributions of implicit (unconscious) processes to the concurrent adaptation of one's reaches to two opposing, randomly switching, novel visuomotor mappings (i.e., dual visuomotor adaptation). 59 right-handed participants were divided into two groups, a Dual adaptation group and a Single adaptation group, and trained to reach when small visuomotor distortions were introduced. The Dual group trained to reach when cursor feedback was rotated (i) 20° clockwise (CW) relative to hand motion when a target was displayed in the left visual workspace and (ii) 20° counterclockwise (CCW) relative to hand motion when a target was displayed in the right visual workspace. The Single group trained to reach with just one 20° cursor rotation (CW or CCW) in both visual workspaces. Results revealed that all participants adapted their reaches to the distorted cursor feedback. For all groups, visuomotor adaptation arose implicitly, in the absence of explicit (conscious strategy) contributions. However, the Dual group demonstrated significantly less implicit adaptation than participants who trained with a Single CW distortion, even after additional reach training trials. Together, these results indicate a role for implicit processes in simultaneously updating one's reaches to two small visuomotor mappings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39653866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.