ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Efficacy and safety of a novel multisegmented fully covered self-expanding metal stent for malignant esophageal obstruction: a prospective pilot study with historical control.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety of long-term esophageal stent placement and a predictive model for restenosis: A double-center retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A comparative study of the structural-mechanical and porosity characteristics of multi-structure vascular scaffolds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsSelf-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) are effective for symptom palliation in patients with esophageal obstruction. However, their placement can lead to adverse events such as stent migration and restenosis. A novel fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) with antimigration properties has been developed to address these issues. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this novel stent in treating malignant esophageal obstruction.
methodsThis prospective pilot study enrolled patients with malignant esophageal obstruction treated with the novel stent at a tertiary referral center. Primary outcomes included technical and clinical efficacy, whereas secondary outcomes were adverse events. Treatment outcomes were compared between the novel stent and historical control groups.
results137 patients were analyzed, comprising 32 in the novel stent group and 105 in the historical control group. In the novel stent group, technical success was achieved in 100% of patients and clinical success in 96.9%. No stent placement-related events, including bleeding or perforation, were observed. Though no significant differences in adverse events were found, the novel stent group had a lower migration rate than the historical control group (9.4% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.565). Median stent patency was similar between the groups (70.5 vs. 43.0 days, p = 0.185).
conclusionsThe novel multisegmented FCSEMS demonstrated high technical and clinical efficacy with a low migration rate, presenting a promising treatment option for malignant esophageal obstruction. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39653861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.