ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
Assessing Micturition, sexual function, and endoscopic outcomes one year after Aquablation: a single center prospective study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ejaculatory function after robotic waterjet ablation for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Reproducibility of Aquablation outcomes across surgeon experience levels: A descriptive analysis of published studies.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Real-World outcomes of aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative analysis of the international collaborative aquablation research urology society (ICARUS) database, WATER and WATER-II trials.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- One-month postoperative α-blocker therapy reduces morbidity and increases patients' satisfaction and well-being following water jet aquablation for treating benign prostatic obstruction: a randomized prospective trial.Central European journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMorphological changes in the prostatic urethra and bladder cavity resulting from Aquablation treatment are still unknown. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of Aquablation within one-year post-surgery, focusing on both functional and endoscopic outcomes.
methodsProspective enrollment of patients undergoing Aquablation (10/2018-04/2023) included those with baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 10, prostate volume from 40 to 80 mL, and Qmax ≤ 12 mL/s. Functional outcomes were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using uroflowmetry (Qmax), and dedicated questionnaires. Cystoscopy at three months assessed ablation quality on a Likert scale (1-poor; 5-excellent). Measurements included cavity length post-treatment and preserved prostatic tissue length at the apex. Additional evaluations encompassed veru-montanum preservation, presence of residual fluffy tissue or mucous flaps, ureteral orifices and bladder trigone injuries.
resultsOut of 109 enrolled patients, one-year follow-up displayed significant improvements in Qmax (+ 103.08%), IPSS (-86.36%), and IPSS-QoL (-80.00%). Aquablation had no impact on erectile function and continence, preserving ejaculation in 96.3%. Of the 106 patients undergoing cystoscopy, prostatic urethra patency was satisfactory to perfect in 96.2%, with a median cavity length of 24 ± 8.2 mm. Residual median lobe was found in 11.3%, without significant impact on micturition outcomes. Positive outcomes included minimal fluffy tissue and mucosal flaps, and well-preserved ureteral meatuses, verumontanum, and bladder trigone.
conclusionsAquablation showed efficacy in solving urinary symptoms with minimal impact on ejaculation up to one year post-surgery. A three-month post-surgery endoscopic evaluation supports its safety, efficacy, and conformity with the ablative planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39653839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.