Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39653828›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025

High interobserver variability of PTEN immunohistochemistry defining PTEN status in low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer: results of the first German ring trial.

Oliver Hommerding, Marit Bernhardt, Tobias Kreft, Anna Scherping, Mahmoud Abbas, Gustavo Baretton, Jan Hinrich Bräsen, Johannes Breyer, Christopher Darr, Franz Friedrich Dressler and 25 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biomarkers and testing in pathology.Current opinion in urology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Oliver HommerdingInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Marit BernhardtInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tobias KreftInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Anna ScherpingInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Mahmoud AbbasInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Gustavo BarettonInstitute of Pathology, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jan Hinrich BräsenInstitute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Johannes BreyerDepartment of Urology, Caritas Hospital St. Josef, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christopher DarrDepartment of Urology, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany.
Franz Friedrich DresslerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Site, Lübeck, Germany.
Jörg EllingerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ramona ErberInstitute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Irene EspositoInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University and University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Wolfgang HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Barbara HeitplatzInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Hans KreipeInstitute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Marcel LafosInstitute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Johannes LinxweilerDepartment of Urology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Cristina Lopez-CotareloInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Verena SailerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Site, Lübeck, Germany.
Henning ReisInstitute of Pathology, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany.
Matthias SaarCurrent Affiliation: Department of Urology, Aachen University (RWTH), Aachen, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich SchildhausInstitute of Pathology, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg Essen, Essen, Germany.
Katrin SchlackProstate Center, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Matthias SchmidInstitute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Maximilian SeidlInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University and University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Axel SemjonowProstate Center, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Ulrich SommerInstitute of Pathology, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Phillip Rolf StahlDepartment of Pathology, MSB Medical School Berlin, 14197, Berlin, Germany.
Verena TischlerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Florian WeberInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Anna-Lena WulfInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Bernd WullichDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Glen KristiansenInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. glen.kristiansen@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4149-5487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostication of individual disease trajectory and selection of optimal therapy in patients with localized, low-grade prostate cancer often presents significant difficulty. The phosphatase and tensin homolog on chromosome 10 (PTEN) has emerged as a potential novel biomarker in this clinical context, based on its demonstrated prognostic significance in multiple retrospective studies. Incorporation into standard clinical practice necessitates exceptional diagnostic accuracy, and PTEN's binary readout-retention or loss-suggests its suitability as a biomarker. This multi-institutional ring trial aimed to validate the diagnostic precision of PTEN immunohistochemistry in localized, low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer, across ten university pathology institutes in Germany. The trial incorporated 90 cases of patients diagnosed with acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate of grade groups 1 (n = 8, 8.9%) and 2 (n = 82, 91.1%) post-radical prostatectomy. Remarkably, the interpretation of PTEN immunohistochemistry displayed substantial variation (12.5-51.2% PTEN loss rates) within an identical cohort of prostate cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis demonstrated PTEN hemizygous deletions in 5.5% (5/90) of cases. All cases with hemizygous deletions presented a distinct loss of PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry and were unanimously identified as PTEN loss by all participants (sensitivity 100%). However, negative (loss) immunohistochemistry was relatively non-specific for an underlying genomic deletion. Improved inter-observer agreement was observed in a subsequent ring trial. Finally, we identify S473-pAKT immunohistochemistry as a useful marker in equivocal cases. In summary, this multi-institutional ring trial illustrates surprisingly heterogeneous outcomes in defining PTEN status by immunohistochemistry.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorImmunohistochemistryProstatic NeoplasmsPTEN PhosphohydrolaseAgedGermanyHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanActive surveillanceAKTPrognostic biomarkerProstate cancerPTEN

Identifiers

PMID39653828
PMCPMC12289804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.