ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Evaluation of clinical trials addressing supportive care measures for management of acute and chronic radiation toxicities.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRadiation therapy can cause acute and long-term side effects despite advances in treatment delivery techniques. While significant research has been conducted to prevent the occurrence of toxicity, there is a need for evidence-based supportive care measures to manage radiation side effects. This analysis aims to examine the current state of supportive care trials in radiation oncology and identify areas that require further study.
methodsA Clinicaltrials.gov search was conducted using the term "radiation toxicity" to identify registered trials with a primary endpoint of toxicity management. These studies were further classified as supportive care interventions or toxicity prevention. Study details were evaluated for all supportive care trials.
resultsOf the thirty-eight supportive care trials identified, most were observational/uncategorized (50%), in phase III (28.9%), or phase II (13.2%). Head and neck (42.1%), genitourinary (18.4%), and breast (13.2%) were the most studied disease sites. Xerostomia (23.7%), mucositis (18.4%), and dermatitis (18.4%) were the most evaluated toxicities. Medication-based (28.9%), procedures (28.9%), and topical agents (21.1%) were the most common interventions. Thirty-two studies included patient-reported outcomes (PROs; 84.2%), of which seventeen trials (53.1%) had PROs as a primary endpoint.
conclusionsOnly a small portion of supportive care trials generate high-level evidence to evaluate interventions with patient-reported endpoints. More supportive care trials are needed to effectively manage radiation toxicities and promote compliance and long-term quality of life during and after radiation therapy. Increased funding from government and industry sponsors is required to support this research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39653822What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.