Trial reportLasers in medical science2024
Immediate effects of traditional and laser acupuncture in chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the potential transdiagnostic treatment effects of Chinese herbal medicine and acupuncture on insomnia disorder comorbid with chronic pain: A scoping review.Integrative medicine research · 2025Review
- Impact of laser acupuncture on gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after acute appendicitis surgery: A retrospective clinical study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neck pain is considered one of the most prevalent global public health problems. This study aimed to compare the immediate and subsequent effects of traditional acupuncture (TA) and laser acupuncture (LA) therapies in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain. Eighty-four individuals were randomly allocated into 3 groups: TA (needle acupuncture treatment), LA (laser acupuncture treatment: 808 nm; 100 mW; 10 J per point), and S-LA (sham laser acupuncture). The participants were men and women aged between 18 and 60 years who had experienced chronic non-specific neck pain for a minimum period of 3 months. The Tianzhu, Fengchi, Jianjing, and Jianzhongshu acupuncture points were stimulated bilaterally. The primary outcomes were pain intensities at rest and during active neck movements, assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale. The secondary outcomes were Pressure Pain Threshold, Temporal Summation of pain, Conditioned Pain Modulation, and Global Perceived Effect scale. The assessments were performed immediately before and after a single treatment session. Additionally, determinations of pain intensity at rest and Global Perceived Effect were performed in a follow-up assessment one month after the interventions. The results showed that the TA and LA interventions were equally significantly superior in reducing immediate pain compared to placebo laser acupuncture (p = 0.001). Traditional acupuncture and laser acupuncture provided equally effective reductions of pain intensity in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Clinical Trial registration: RBR-7vbw5gd (Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials - ReBEC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39653805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.