Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39653805›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2024

Immediate effects of traditional and laser acupuncture in chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Rafaela Peron, Cláudio Gregório Nuernberg Back, Érika Patrícia Rampazo, Milene Branco, Cleber Ferraresi, Richard Eloin Liebano

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rafaela PeronDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8941-2885
Cláudio Gregório Nuernberg BackDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-7011
Érika Patrícia RampazoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-6902
Milene BrancoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7640-9503
Cleber FerraresiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-8390
Richard Eloin LiebanoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil. liebano@hartford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4795-6723

Funding

FAPESP 2020/16116-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neck pain is considered one of the most prevalent global public health problems. This study aimed to compare the immediate and subsequent effects of traditional acupuncture (TA) and laser acupuncture (LA) therapies in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain. Eighty-four individuals were randomly allocated into 3 groups: TA (needle acupuncture treatment), LA (laser acupuncture treatment: 808 nm; 100 mW; 10 J per point), and S-LA (sham laser acupuncture). The participants were men and women aged between 18 and 60 years who had experienced chronic non-specific neck pain for a minimum period of 3 months. The Tianzhu, Fengchi, Jianjing, and Jianzhongshu acupuncture points were stimulated bilaterally. The primary outcomes were pain intensities at rest and during active neck movements, assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale. The secondary outcomes were Pressure Pain Threshold, Temporal Summation of pain, Conditioned Pain Modulation, and Global Perceived Effect scale. The assessments were performed immediately before and after a single treatment session. Additionally, determinations of pain intensity at rest and Global Perceived Effect were performed in a follow-up assessment one month after the interventions. The results showed that the TA and LA interventions were equally significantly superior in reducing immediate pain compared to placebo laser acupuncture (p = 0.001). Traditional acupuncture and laser acupuncture provided equally effective reductions of pain intensity in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Clinical Trial registration: RBR-7vbw5gd (Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials - ReBEC).

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyChronic PainNeck PainAcupuncture PointsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDouble-blind controlled clinical trialLaser acupunctureNeck painRandomized controlled trialTraditional acupuncture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.