ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Parental attitudes and experiences in pursuing genetic testing for their child's motor speech disorder.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Childhood motor speech disorders: who to prioritise for genetic testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Summer reading 2025 in EJHG.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rare and typically severe motor speech disorders such as childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and dysarthria affect about 1 in 1000 children. The genetic basis of these speech disorders is well-documented, with approximately 30% of children who undergo genomic testing receiving an explanatory genetic diagnosis. As more children with speech disorders are offered genetic testing, understanding parental views and experiences around genetic testing for their child is critical in providing effective pre- and post-test genetic counselling. This research explored parental attitudes, experiences, and perceived implications of pursuing genetic testing for their child with motor speech disorder. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 parents of children with CAS or dysarthria who had undergone exome sequencing. Eight parents had received a genetic diagnosis for their child and 12 received uninformative genetic test results. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, co-coded, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Parents were highly motivated to pursue genetic testing for their child's speech disorder due to the perceived personal, clinical, social, and financial utility in obtaining a genetic diagnosis. Regardless of testing outcome, parents experienced complex emotional responses in receiving their child's genetic test results. Parents whose child received a genetic diagnosis reported improved access to funding and clinical care; however, they also hoped for ongoing informational, clinical, and peer support in navigating the uncertainty surrounding their child's rare diagnosis. Conversely, parents who received uninformative genetic test results reported finding meaning in this test outcome, and used emotional-focused and problem-focused strategies to cope with their child's continued diagnostic odyssey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.