Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39653690›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council2024

The Spiral of Attention, Arousal, and Release: A Comparative Phenomenology of Jhāna Meditation and Speaking in Tongues.

Josh Brahinsky, Jonas Mago, Mark Miller, Shaila Catherine, Michael Lifshitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Josh BrahinskyDivision of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9128-2087
Jonas MagoDivision of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Mark MillerMonash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shaila CatherineMeditation Teacher, San Jose, California, USA.
Michael LifshitzDivision of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7051-4248

Funding

Fundação BialJohn Templeton FoundationMathematical Metaphysics InstituteMind and Life InstituteSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilThe Monash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative StudiesUS National Science Foundation-Anthropology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buddhist Jhāna meditation and the Christian practice of speaking in tongues appear wildly distinct. These spiritual techniques differ in their ethical, theological, and historical frames and seem, from the outside, to produce markedly different states of consciousness-one a state of utter calm and the other of high emotional arousal. Yet, our phenomenological interviews with experienced practitioners in the USA found significant points of convergence. Practitioners in both traditions describe a dynamic relationship between focused attention, aroused joy, and a sense of letting go or release that they describe as crucial to their practice. This paper highlights these shared phenomenological features and theorizes possible underlying mechanisms. Analyzing our phenomenological data through the lens of various theories of brain function, including sensory gating and predictive processing, we propose that these practices both engage an autonomic field built through a spiral between attention, arousal, and release (AAR).

Indexed as

ArousalAttentionBuddhismMeditationHumansSpeechhigh arousal contemplationJhāna meditationspeaking in tongues

Identifiers

PMID39653690
PMCPMC11645872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.