ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2025
Development and validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous analysis of isoniazid and pyrazinamide in cerebrospinal fluid.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Clinical Evaluation of an LC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Isoniazid in Cerebrospinal Fluid from Tuberculous Meningitis.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Advances in the Treatment and Clinical Management Strategies of Tuberculous Meningitis.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For the effective treatment of tuberculosis with first-line anti-tubercular drugs, drug concentrations need to be measured at the site of infection to determine drug exposure. To enable the measurement of the anti-tuberculosis drugs isoniazid and pyrazinamide in the nervous system of patients with tuberculous meningitis, an analytical method was developed and validated for the quantification of these drugs in human cerebrospinal fluid. Samples were prepared by solid phase extraction using Strata-X polymeric extraction plates. The analytes were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography on an Atlantis T3, 100 A, 3 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm analytical column with gradient elution, employing a mobile phase that consisted of acetonitrile-methanol-formic acid (50:50:0.1, v/v/v), at a flowrate of 0.25 mL/min. The total run time was 4.5 minutes, and the average retention times of isoniazid and pyrazinamide were 1.1 and 1.3 min, respectively. The analytes and their respective deuterated internal standards were detected on a Sciex API4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer applying positive electrospray ionization with multiple reaction monitoring as the detection mode. The method was validated according to the FDA and EMA guidelines. The method was demonstrated to be accurate, reproducible, and robust, showing the necessary sensitivity and specificity for the quantification of isoniazid and pyrazinamide in cerebrospinal fluid. The method was successfully applied to analyze clinical samples from the LASER-TBM and TBM-KIDS clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.