ArticleBMJ open2024
What do parents, professionals and policy colleagues want from a universal assessment of child development in the early years? A qualitative study in England.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a universal 3-4 month Healthy Child Programme visit in a local area of England: a mixed methods study.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Navigating structural demands and relational care: a qualitative study of public health nurses' experiences and handling of online screening tools.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Measuring child development at the 2-2½-year health and development review in England: a rapid scoping review of available tools.BMJ open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEvery child in England should be offered a health and development review at age 2-2½ years by the health visiting service, part of which includes an assessment of child development. The Department of Health and Social Care mandates the use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) at this review as a tool to collect population-level data on children's early development for monitoring of trends and disparities. This tool also forms part of the practitioner's assessment of the child's early development. To inform policy and practice, the present study gathered the views and experiences of parents and health visiting professionals on key priorities for, and barriers to, a universal assessment of early child development at age 2-2½ years. DESIGN, SETTING,
participantsWe held 15 focus groups with 29 parents, 24 health visitors and nursery nurses, five service managers and five policy colleagues in England. Participants were asked to reflect on their experiences of, and priorities for, measuring child development at the 2-2½ year universal review. ANALYSIS: We analysed data using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
resultsWe identified two overarching themes in the data. The first theme,
conclusionsParents and practitioners wanted a tool that facilitated a holistic conversation about development, well-being and health across the family system, with direct observation of the child by the professional. Used skilfully, the tool can constitute an intervention in itself, as it helps scaffold a conversation about how parents can support their child's optimal growth and development. Consideration should be given to the experience of and support available to the practitioner using the tool within the health and developmental review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.