ArticleBMJ open2024
Engaging stakeholders in Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) Implementation Research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleeping without borders: Gaps in contextualizing sleep duration guidelines for adults in low-income countries.Sleep medicine: X · 2026Article
- Mapping stakeholders for developing cancer research in Small Island Developing States: a descriptive study from the Eastern Caribbean.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Health inequality in the disease burden of non-communicable diseases among the elderly from 1990 to 2021, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of global burden of disease study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNon-communicable diseases (NCDs) present a significant health challenge globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Effective Implementation Research (IR) is vital in addressing this challenge, with stakeholder engagement playing a crucial role. However, the landscape of stakeholder engagement in NCD IR within LMICs faces unique challenges, including resource constraints and power imbalances. Despite these challenges, stakeholder engagement offers substantial benefits, including improved research relevance and sustainability of interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review aims to comprehensively describe the current practices of stakeholder engagement in NCD IR within LMICs. Employing a two-stage screening process and a thematic synthesis approach based on the International Association for Public Participation Spectrum of Public Participation, the review will analyse studies meeting predefined eligibility criteria. A rigorous search strategy will be implemented across identified electronic databases and grey literature sources, including published studies from 2011 to present. Data will be charted using a standardised form, and information regarding study characteristics, NCD focus, LMIC context, stakeholder engagement method and reported outcomes/findings will be collected. This scoping review will follow a standard protocol adhering to the methodological framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley to comprehensively map existing evidence on stakeholder engagement in NCD IR within LMICs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical considerations involve respecting original authors, maintaining integrity and transparency, managing data ethically and disclosing conflicts of interest. Dissemination will occur through publication in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, open-access repositories, policy briefs, stakeholder engagement activities and social media platforms. REGISTRATION: This scoping review protocol is registered on Open Science Framework, with the Digital Object Identifier 10.17605/OSF.IO/ACQ52, ensuring transparency and accountability in the research process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.