Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39653499›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2025

Transition from neonatal to paediatric intensive care of very preterm-born children: a cohort study of children born between 2013 and 2018 in England and Wales.

Tim J van Hasselt, Suzy Newman, Hari Krishnan Kanthimathinathan, Peter J Davis, Elizabeth S Draper, Chris Gale, Cheryl Battersby, Sarah E Seaton, United Kingdom Neonatal Collaborative and the Paediatric Critical Care Society Study Group (PCCS-SG)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tim J van HasseltDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK t.vanhasselt@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-1083
Suzy NewmanParent of child with medical complexity, UK.
Hari Krishnan KanthimathinathanBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Peter J DavisBristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0669-2485
Elizabeth S DraperDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Chris GaleNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0707-876X
Cheryl BattersbyNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2898-553X
Sarah E SeatonDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8711-4817
United Kingdom Neonatal Collaborative and the Paediatric Critical Care Society Study Group (PCCS-SG)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFollowing very preterm birth, some children require ongoing intensive care after the neonatal period and transition directly from neonatal units (NNUs) to paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) around term-corrected age.We aimed to understand, at a national level, characteristics and outcomes of children born very preterm who transitioned directly from NNUs to PICUs.

designRetrospective cohort study, using data linkage of National Neonatal Research Database, Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network and Office for National Statistics datasets.

settingAll NNUs and PICUs in England and Wales. PATIENTS: Children born <32 gestational weeks between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018, admitted to NNUs, and who transitioned directly to PICU without return to NNU at ≥36 weeks corrected gestation age were included.

main outcome measuresMortality, length of PICU stay, invasive ventilation in PICU (including via tracheostomy), PICU readmission until 2 years of age.

resultsDirect NNU-to-PICU transitions occurred in 276 babies during the study period. An increasing yearly trend was observed: 36 transitions of babies born in 2013, 65 in 2018.Of this cohort, 22% of children died before their second birthday, 59% of survivors had ≥1 PICU readmission, 33% of children had long stays in PICU (≥28 days) and 25% received tracheostomy ventilation.

conclusionsAn increasing number of very preterm children require ongoing intensive care at the end of their neonatal stay, with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Multidisciplinary involvement and planning around the time of transition from NNU to PICU, informed by national guidance, may be beneficial.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, PediatricChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLength of StayMalePatient ReadmissionRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesIntensive Care Units, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, PaediatricNeonatologyPaediatricsPalliative Care

Identifiers

PMID39653499
PMCPMC12229064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.