Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39653370›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2024

Current State of Community-Driven Radiological AI Deployment in Medical Imaging.

Vikash Gupta, Barbaros Erdal, Carolina Ramirez, Ralf Floca, Bradley Genereaux, Sidney Bryson, Christopher Bridge, Jens Kleesiek, Felix Nensa, Rickmer Braren and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Vikash GuptaMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6786-9865
Barbaros ErdalMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-0102
Carolina RamirezUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1440-2741
Ralf FlocaGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3218-3377
Bradley GenereauxNvidia Inc, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2923-2887
Sidney BrysonNvidia Inc, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7938-2807
Christopher BridgeMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2242-351X
Jens KleesiekInstitute for AI in Medicine, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-0682
Felix NensaInstitute for AI in Medicine, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-7100
Rickmer BrarenInstitute for Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6039-6957
Khaled YounisMedAiConsult, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-3332
Tobias PenzkoferDepartment of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9591-8575
Andreas Michael BucherUniversity Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5012-161X
Ming Melvin QinNvidia Inc, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8368-2136
Gigon BaeNvidia Inc, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0648-9735
Hyeonhoon LeeBiomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9426-823X
M Jorge CardosoSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-2558
Sebastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5694-5340
Eric KerfootSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7255-6417
Rahul ChoudhuryNvidia Inc, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6012-5226
Richard D WhiteMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1133-7819
Tessa CookPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6007-7267
David BericatNvidia Inc, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2897-7744
Matthew LungrenMicrosoft Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8591-5861
Risto HaukiojaNvidia Inc, Santa Clara, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0592-2325
Haris ShuaibClinical Scientific Computing, Medical Physics, Newton's Tree, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-5960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become commonplace in solving routine everyday tasks. Because of the exponential growth in medical imaging data volume and complexity, the workload on radiologists is steadily increasing. AI has been shown to improve efficiency in medical image generation, processing, and interpretation, and various such AI models have been developed across research laboratories worldwide. However, very few of these, if any, find their way into routine clinical use, a discrepancy that reflects the divide between AI research and successful AI translation. The goal of this paper is to give an overview of the intersection of AI and medical imaging landscapes. We also want to inform the readers about the importance of using standards in their radiology workflow and the challenges associated with deploying AI models in the clinical workflow. The main focus of this paper is to examine the existing condition of radiology workflow and identify the challenges hindering the implementation of AI in hospital settings. This report reflects extensive weekly discussions and practical problem-solving expertise accumulated over multiple years by industry experts, imaging informatics professionals, research scientists, and clinicians. To gain a deeper understanding of the requirements for deploying AI models, we introduce a taxonomy of AI use cases, supplemented by real-world instances of AI model integration within hospitals. We will also explain how the need for AI integration in radiology can be addressed using the Medical Open Network for AI (MONAI). MONAI is an open-source consortium for providing reproducible deep learning solutions and integration tools for radiology practice in hospitals.

Indexed as

adoptionartificial intelligenceclinical deploymentdeep learningimagingimaging informaticsimplementationintegrationmachine learningmedical informaticsmobile phonemodelopen-sourceoperationradiologyradiology in practicetaxonomyuse caseworkflow

Identifiers

PMID39653370
PMCPMC11667144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.