Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39653318›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2025

Restoration of physiologic loading after engineered disc implantation mitigates immobilization-induced facet joint and paraspinal muscle degeneration.

Sarah E Gullbrand, Ali Kiapour, Caitlin Barrett, Matthew Fainor, Brianna S Orozco, Rachel Hilliard, Robert L Mauck, Michael W Hast, Thomas P Schaer, Harvey E Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Intervertebral disc degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah E GullbrandDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: sgullb@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Ali KiapourDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Caitlin BarrettDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew FainorDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brianna S OrozcoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rachel HilliardDepartment of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert L MauckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael W HastDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas P SchaerDepartment of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Harvey E SmithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: Harvey.Smith@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Overall: Resource-based Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders Research (Overall Application)P30AR069619 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOUIS J SOSLOWSKY · 2016 to 2026
$9.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069619RRD VA I01 RX002274RRD VA IK2 RX003118RRD VA IK6 RX003416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervertebral disc degeneration is commonly associated with back and neck pain, and standard surgical treatments do not restore spine function. Replacement of the degenerative disc with a living, tissue-engineered construct has the potential to restore normal structure and function to the spine. Toward this goal, our group developed endplate-modified disc-like angle-ply structures (eDAPS) that recapitulate the native structure and function of the disc. While our initial large animal studies utilized rigid internal fixation of the eDAPS implanted level to ensure retention of the eDAPS, chronic immobilization does not restore full function and is detrimental to the spinal motion segment. The purpose of this study was to utilize a goat cervical disc replacement model coupled with finite element modeling of goat cervical motion segments to investigate the effects of remobilization (removal of fixation) on the eDAPS, the facet joints and the adjacent paraspinal muscle. Our results demonstrated that chronic immobilization caused notable degeneration of the facet joints and paraspinal muscles adjacent to eDAPS implants. Remobilization improved eDAPS composition and integration and mitigated, but did not fully reverse, facet joint osteoarthritis and paraspinal muscle atrophy and fibrosis. Finite element modeling revealed that these changes were likely due to reduced range of motion and reduced facet loading, highlighting the importance of maintaining normal spine biomechanical function with any tissue engineered disc replacement. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Back and neck pain are ubiquitous in modern society, and the gold standard surgical treatment of spinal fusion limits patient function. This study advances our understanding of the response of the spinal motion segment to tissue engineered disc replacement with provisional fixation in a large animal model, further advancing the clinical translation of this technology.

Indexed as

ImmobilizationIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationParaspinal MusclesTissue EngineeringTotal Disc ReplacementZygapophyseal JointAnimalsFinite Element AnalysisGoatsWeight-BearingDisc tissue engineeringFinite element modelLarge animal modelRemobilization

Identifiers

PMID39653318
PMCPMC11735281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.