Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of tezepelumab versus placebo in adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COURSE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04039113 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Phase 2a Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Phase 2a Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (COURSE)
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of Biologics in Patients with Moderate to Very Severe COPD: A Systematic Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Anti-type 2 monoclonal antibody therapy for eosinophilic COPD beyond triple therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with strict eosinophil inclusion criteria.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Maintenance Therapy Strategies for Quality of Life in COPD: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Biologics Targeting Type 2 Inflammation in COPD: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Pooled it
- Updates in COPD Management: From Inflammatory Pathways to Targeted Therapies.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Different Inflammatory Phenotypes and Immune Endotypes Drive Disease Heterogeneity in Asthma and COPD.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- COPD Biologics: Right Patient, Right Pathway, Right Time.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Short-term longitudinal variation in exhaled nitric oxide fraction predicts future moderate-to-severe exacerbations in COPD patients on triple therapy: a prospective cohort study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Integrative Omics of Eosinophils in Asthma and COPD: Deciphering Molecular Signatures for Targeted Therapy.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Biologics in Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Imaging endpoints for biologic therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Epithelial cells in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: Targets for lung repair.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Beyond Triple Therapy: Anti-Type 2 Biologic Therapies for Eosinophilic COPD and Respiratory Comorbidities - a Review of Clinical Evidence.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- CM512, a potentially novel IgG1-based bispecific antibody dual-targeting TSLP and IL-13, for the suppression of type 2 inflammation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Biologics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Current Status and Future Prospects.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Article
- Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current pipeline and new opportunities.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Singapore: Current Perspectives on Prevalence, Disease Burden, and Treatment.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
- Comments on "Established and Emerging Biological Therapies for the Treatment of Comorbid Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease" [Letter].Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, which has shown increased expression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with healthy individuals. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab in patients with moderate to very severe COPD despite receiving triple inhaled therapy.
methodsCOURSE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial across 90 sites in ten countries in Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible participants were aged 40-80 years, had moderate to very severe airflow limitation, were receiving triple inhaled maintenance therapy, and had at least two moderate to severe COPD exacerbations in the 12 months before enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive tezepelumab 420 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for up to 52 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region and by number of exacerbations in the 12 months before enrolment. Participants, investigators, site staff, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the annualised rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations over 52 weeks. A prespecified subgroup analysis assessed the primary endpoint in patients grouped by baseline blood eosinophil counts (BECs). Efficacy and safety were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04039113 (completed).
findingsBetween July 30, 2019, and Oct 4, 2022, 333 patients (mean age 67·2 years [SD 7·0]; 145 [44%] female and 188 [56%] male; 293 [88%] White, 34 [10%] Asian, and four [1%] Black or African American) were randomly assigned and treated with tezepelumab (n=165) or placebo (n=168). The annualised rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations over 52 weeks was 1·75 for tezepelumab versus 2·11 for placebo (rate ratio 0·83 [90% CI 0·64-1·06]; p=0·10 [one-sided]; the primary endpoint was not met). In prespecified subgroup analyses, the annualised rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations over 52 weeks was 2·04 with tezepelumab versus 1·71 with placebo (rate ratio 1·19 [95% CI 0·75-1·90]) in patients with a baseline BEC of less than 150 cells per μL, 1·64 versus 2·47 (0·66 [0·42-1·04]) in patients with a baseline BEC of 150 cells per μL to less than 300 cells per μL, and 1·20 versus 2·24 (0·54 [0·25-1·15]) in patients with a baseline BEC of 300 cells per μL or higher. Adverse events occurred in 133 (81%) of 165 patients in the tezepelumab group and 126 (75%) of 168 patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in 49 (30%) patients in the tezepelumab group and 50 (30%) patients in the placebo group. Five patients died while receiving study treatment: two in the tezepelumab group and three in the placebo group. No deaths were determined to be causally related to study treatment by investigator assessment.
interpretationA significant reduction was not observed in the annualised rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations with tezepelumab versus placebo. Further studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with moderate to very severe COPD, particularly in patients with a baseline BEC of 150 cells per μL or higher. Tezepelumab was well tolerated, with no safety concerns identified.
fundingAstraZeneca and Amgen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39653044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.