ArticleAnnals of plastic surgery2025
Comprehensive Validation of the German Version of the LIMB-Q.
Article in Annals of plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Gatos Clinical Test questionnaire in patients with severe dementia.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLower extremity trauma significantly impacts patients' lives, requiring a nuanced approach to evaluate outcomes beyond clinical measures. The LIMB-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), assesses the multifaceted impacts of lower extremity trauma, including physical and emotional dimensions, from the patient's perspective. This study validates the German version of the LIMB-Q.
methodsWe relied on the translation of the LIMB-Q that had followed the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research best practice guidelines. Sixty patients who had undergone reconstructive surgery or amputation of the lower limb completed the LIMB-Q, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Internal consistency of the German LIMB-Q was determined by Cronbach's alpha, and reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Construct validity was analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients between the LIMB-Q, LEFS, and SF-36.
resultsValidation involved 60 patients. Internal consistency in a test-retest subset of 5 patients was good to excellent (α: 0.891 to 0.965). The intraclass correlation coefficient for these scales ranged from 0.821 to 1. The LIMB-Q domains significantly correlated with the corresponding domains of the SF-36 and LEFS, confirming excellent construct validity.
conclusionsThe German version of the LIMB-Q is conceptually equivalent to the original English version. It is a reliable and valid PROM for assessing physical and psychological impairments in patients who have undergone lower extremity reconstructive surgery or amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.