Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39652764›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The long-term impact of debt relief for indigent defendants in a misdemeanor court.

Lindsay Bing, Rebecca Goldstein, Helen Ho, Devah Pager, Bruce Western

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Legal Financial Obligations: An Understudied Public Health Exposure.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. The long-term impact of debt relief for indigent defendants in a misdemeanor court.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lindsay BingDepartment of Sociology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H4, Canada.
Rebecca GoldsteinSchool of Law, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Helen HoChinese for Affirmative Action, San Francisco, CA 94108.
Devah PagerDepartment of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Bruce WesternDepartment of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.ORCID 0000-0001-8615-6767

Funding

Arnold Ventures (AV) 22-06978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

US courts regularly assess fines, fees, and costs against criminal defendants. Court-related debt can cause continuing court involvement and incarceration, not because of new crimes, but because of unpaid financial obligations. We conducted an experiment with 606 people found guilty of misdemeanors in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. Study participants were randomly selected to receive relief from all current and prior fines and fees assessed for criminal charges in the county. Fee relief reduced jail bookings 21 mo after randomization and the effect persisted over 44 mo of follow-up. Although fee relief reduced incarceration, financial sanctions had no effect on indicators of lawbreaking. Instead, the control group (who obtained no relief from fines and fees) were rearrested at significantly higher rates because of open arrest warrants for nonpayment. These results indicate the long-term and criminalizing effects of legal debt, supporting claims that financial sanctions disproportionately harm low-income defendants while contributing little to public safety.

Indexed as

PovertyAdultCrimeCriminalsFemaleHumansMaleOklahomafines and feesjailpovertyrandomized experiment

Identifiers

PMID39652764
PMCPMC11665892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.