Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39652754›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Global rarity of high-integrity tropical rainforests for threatened and declining terrestrial vertebrates.

Rajeev Pillay, James E M Watson, Andrew J Hansen, Patrick Burns, Anne Lucy Stilger Virnig, Christina Supples, Dolors Armenteras, Pamela González-Del-Pliego, Jose Aragon-Osejo, Patrick A Jantz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Global rarity of high-integrity tropical rainforests for threatened and declining terrestrial vertebrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rajeev PillayNatural Resources and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia V2N 4Z9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7116-6855
James E M WatsonSchool of The Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4942-1984
Andrew J HansenDepartment of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-3460.
Patrick BurnsSchool of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011.ORCID 0000-0001-7971-4177
Anne Lucy Stilger VirnigUnited Nations Development Programme, New York, NY 10017.ORCID 0000-0002-7903-7863
Christina SupplesUnited Nations Development Programme, New York, NY 10017.
Dolors ArmenterasDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0922-7298
Pamela González-Del-PliegoRui Nabeiro Biodiversity Chair, Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Universidade de Évora, Évora 7006-554, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-3332
Jose Aragon-OsejoNatural Resources and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia V2N 4Z9, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-1899-1009
Patrick A JantzSchool of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011.
Jamison ErvinUnited Nations Development Programme, New York, NY 10017.
Scott J GoetzSchool of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011.ORCID 0000-0002-6326-4308
Oscar VenterNatural Resources and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia V2N 4Z9, Canada.

Funding

NASA 80NSSC18K0338NASA NNL15AA03NASA NNX17AG51G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structurally intact native forests free from major human pressures are vitally important habitats for the persistence of forest biodiversity. However, the extent of such high-integrity forest habitats remaining for biodiversity is unknown. Here, we quantify the amount of high-integrity tropical rainforests, as a fraction of total forest cover, within the geographic ranges of 16,396 species of terrestrial vertebrates worldwide. We found up to 90% of the humid tropical ranges of forest-dependent vertebrates was encompassed by forest cover. Concerningly, however, merely 25% of these remaining rainforests are of high integrity. Forest-dependent species that are threatened and declining and species with small geographic ranges have disproportionately low proportions of high-integrity forest habitat left. Our work brings much needed attention to the poor quality of much of the forest estate remaining for biodiversity across the humid tropics. The targeted preservation of the world's remaining high-integrity tropical rainforests that are currently unprotected is a critical conservation priority that may help alleviate the biodiversity crisis in these hyperdiverse and irreplaceable ecosystems. Enhanced efforts worldwide to preserve tropical rainforest integrity are essential to meet the targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity's 2022 Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework which aims to achieve near zero loss of high biodiversity importance areas (including ecosystems of high integrity) by 2030.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesRainforestVertebratesAnimalsEcosystemEndangered SpeciesTropical Climateforest coverforest integrityhabitat qualityintact foreststerrestrial vertebrates

Identifiers

PMID39652754
PMCPMC11665883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.