ArticlePloS one2024
Sex estimation techniques based on skulls in forensic anthropology: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two-group interlandmark distance analysis for skeletal sex estimation using resampling and posterior probability contour plots.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Classifying Sex from MSCT-Derived 3D Mandibular Models Using an Adapted PointNet++ Deep Learning Approach in a Croatian Population.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning for gender estimation using hand radiographs: a comparative evaluation of CNN models.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Assessing Sternal Dimensions for Sex Classification: Insights from a Greek Computed Tomography-Based Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Lateral Cephalograms as Valuable Antemortem Tools in Forensic Identification of Individuals during Mass Disasters: An Orthodontic Perspective.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSex estimation is an essential topic in the field of individual identification in forensic anthropology. Recent studies have investigated a growing range of techniques for estimating sex from human skulls.
objectivesThis study aims to provide a scoping review of the literature on techniques used in skull-based sex estimation, serving as a valuable reference for researchers. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: The literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2020 to February 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible studies have investigated issues of interest to forensic anthropology about sex estimation using skull samples. CHARTING
methodsA total of 73 studies met the inclusion criteria and were categorized and analyzed based on the anatomic sites, modalities, trait types, and models. Their accuracy in estimating sex was subsequently examined, and the results were charted. RESULTS AND
conclusionsOur review highlights that the 3D medical imaging technique has enhanced the efficiency and stability of skull-based sex estimation. It is anticipated that advancements in 3D imaging and computer vision techniques will facilitate further breakthroughs in this field of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.