ArticlePloS one2024
A speed optimization model for connected and autonomous vehicles at expressway tunnel entrance under mixed traffic environment.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation analysis of traffic flow stability for intelligent connected vehicles at mountain tunnel entrances considering nonlinear coupling effects.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Control strategy for connected automated vehicles to reduce car-following risks and energy consumption on foggy highway.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rear-end collisions frequently occurred in the entrance zone of expressway tunnel, necessitating enhanced traffic safety through speed guidance. However, existing speed optimization models mainly focus on urban signal-controlled intersections or expressway weaving zones, neglecting research on speed optimization in expressway tunnel entrances. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a framework for a speed guidance model in the entrance zone of expressway tunnels under a mixed traffic environment, comprising both Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) and Human-driven Vehicles (HVs). Firstly, a CAV speed optimization model is established based on a shooting heuristic algorithm. The model targets the minimization of the weighted sum of the speed difference between adjacent vehicles and the time taken to reach the tunnel entrance. The model's constraints incorporate safe following distances, speed, and acceleration limits. For HVs, speed trajectories are determined using the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM). The CAV speed optimization model, represented as a mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problem, is solved using A Mathematical Programming Language (AMPL) and the BONMIN solver. Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. The impact on SD and mean TTC is most pronounced when the CAV penetration rate is between 0% and 40%, compared to rates above 40%. The minimum TTC values at different CAV penetration rates consistently exceed the safety threshold TTC*, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed control method in enhanced safety. Sensitivity analysis further supports these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.