ArticlePloS one2024
Recognition of Conus species using a combined approach of supervised learning and deep learning-based feature extraction.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From marine predator to pharmacology: Conotoxin diversity, discovery, and therapeutic potential.Zoological research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cone snails are venomous marine gastropods comprising more than 950 species widely distributed across different habitats. Their conical shells are remarkably similar to those of other invertebrates in terms of color, pattern, and size. For these reasons, assigning taxonomic signatures to cone snail shells is a challenging task. In this report, we propose an ensemble learning strategy based on the combination of Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB) methods. We used 47,600 cone shell images of uniform size (224 x 224 pixels), which were split into an 80:20 train-test ratio. Prior to performing subsequent operations, these images were subjected to pre-processing and transformation. After applying a deep learning approach (Visual Geometry Group with a 16-layer deep model architecture) for feature extraction, model specificity was further assessed by including multiple related and unrelated seashell images. Both classifiers demonstrated comparable recognition ability on random test samples. The evaluation results suggested that RF outperformed XGB due to its high accuracy in recognizing Conus species, with an average precision of 95.78%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.99, indicating the model's optimal performance. The learning and validation curves also demonstrated a robust fit, with the training score reaching 1 and the validation score gradually increasing to 95 as more data was provided. These values indicate a well-trained model that generalizes effectively to validation data without significant overfitting. The gradual improvement in the validation score curve is crucial for ensuring model reliability and minimizing the risk of overfitting. Our findings revealed an interactive visualization. The performance of our proposed model suggests its potential for use with datasets of other mollusks, and optimal results may be achieved for their categorization and taxonomical characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.