ArticlePloS one2024
Radiomics-based machine learning for automated detection of Pneumothorax in CT scans.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Correction: Radiomics-based machine learning for automated detection of Pneumothorax in CT scans.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing complexity of diagnostic imaging often leads to misinterpretations and diagnostic errors, particularly in critical conditions such as pneumothorax. This study addresses the pressing need for improved diagnostic accuracy in CT scans by developing an intelligent model that leverages radiomics features and machine learning techniques. By enhancing the detection of pneumothorax, this research aims to mitigate diagnostic errors and accelerate the process of image interpretation, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Data used in this study was extracted from the medical records of 175 patients with suspected pneumothorax. The collected images were preprocessed in Matlab software. Radiomics features were extracted from each image and finally, the machine learning models were implemented on these features. The used machine learning algorithms are Gradient Tree Boosting (GBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light GBM. To evaluate the performance of models, various evaluation criteria such as precision, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, F1 score, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC), and misclassification were calculated. According to the calculated evaluation criteria, in terms of accuracy, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 98.97%, followed closely by the XGBoost model at 98.29%. For precision, the GBM model outperformed the other models, recording a precision value of 99.55%. Regarding sensitivity, all three models-GBM, XGBoost, and LightGBM (LGBM)-demonstrated strong performance, with sensitivity values of 99%, 99%, and 100%, respectively, indicating minimal variation among them. The artificial intelligence models used in this study have significant potential to enhance patient care by supporting radiologists and other clinicians in the diagnosis of pneumothorax. These models can facilitate the prioritization of positive cases, expedite evaluations, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.