ArticlePloS one2024
Identification of cuproptosis-related genes in septic shock based on bioinformatic analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reassessing sepsis research: new clues for old players and new players for an old symptom to improve patient outcomes.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
- PANoptosis in Sepsis: A Central Role and Emerging Therapeutic Target.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeptic shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by a failure of organ systems and a high mortality rate. Cuproptosis is a new form of cell death that is triggered by copper overload. However, the relationship between cuproptosis-related genes and septic shock remains unclear.
methodsThe GSE26440 dataset from the GEO database was used to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between control and septic shock samples. Additionally, hub genes related to the progression of septic shock and cuproptosis were screened by Venn analysis. RT-qPCR was utilized to validate the expression of hub genes in peripheral blood lymphocytes from septic shock patients and healthy controls. Next, functional analysis and immune cells infiltration were performed.
resultsSLC31A1 and MTF1 levels were obviously elevated and LIAS and LIPT1 levels were downregulated in septic shock samples, compared to normal controls. The diagnostic values of the four genes were confirmed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Additionally, SLC31A1 and MTF1 showed a positive correlation with natural killer cells and LIAS and LIPT1 exhibited a positive correlation with CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, compared to low-level groups, MAPK signaling was activated in the high-SLC31A1 level group, VEGF signaling was activated in the high-MTF1 level group and lipoic acid metabolism was activated in high-LIAS and high-LIPT1 level groups.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that SLC31A1, MTF1, LIAS, and LIPT1 are dysregulated in septic shock samples, and these genes exhibit potential diagnostic efficacy in septic shock, suggesting that these genes may be potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.