Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39652586›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

Separable roles of the DNA damage response kinase Mec1ATR and its activator Rad24RAD17 during meiotic recombination.

Margaret R Crawford, Jon A Harper, Tim J Cooper, Marie-Claude Marsolier-Kergoat, Bertrand Llorente, Matthew J Neale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margaret R CrawfordGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8369-3508
Jon A HarperGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1765-9990
Tim J CooperGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.
Marie-Claude Marsolier-KergoatInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Bertrand LlorenteCancer Research Centre of Marseille, CNRS, INSERM U1068, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université UM105, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6291-5797
Matthew J NealeGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6453-1877

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During meiosis, programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are formed by the topoisomerase-like enzyme, Spo11, activating the DNA damage response (DDR) kinase Mec1ATR via the checkpoint clamp loader, Rad24RAD17. At single loci, loss of Mec1 and Rad24 activity alters DSB formation and recombination outcome, but their genome-wide roles have not been examined in detail. Here, we utilise two strategies-deletion of the mismatch repair protein, Msh2, and control of meiotic prophase length via regulation of the Ndt80 transcription factor-to help characterise the roles Mec1 and Rad24 play in meiotic recombination by enabling genome-wide mapping of meiotic progeny. In line with previous studies, we observe severely impacted spore viability and a reduction in the frequency of recombination upon deletion of RAD24-driven by a shortened prophase. By contrast, loss of Mec1 function increases recombination frequency, consistent with its role in DSB trans-interference, and has less effect on spore viability. Despite these differences, complex multi-chromatid events initiated by closely spaced DSBs-rare in wild-type cells-occur more frequently in the absence of either Rad24 or Mec1, suggesting a loss of spatial regulation at the level of DSB formation in both. Mec1 and Rad24 also have important roles in the spatial regulation of crossovers (COs). Upon loss of either Mec1 or Rad24, CO distributions become more random-suggesting reductions in the global manifestation of interference. Such effects are similar to, but less extreme than, the phenotype of 'ZMM' mutants such as zip3Δ, and may be driven by reductions in the proportion of interfering COs. Collectively, in addition to shared roles in CO regulation, our results highlight separable roles for Rad24 as a pro-CO factor, and for Mec1 as a regulator of recombination frequency, the loss of which helps to suppress any broader defects in CO regulation caused by abrogation of the DDR.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMeiosisProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairEndodeoxyribonucleasesMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11Nuclear ProteinsRecombination, GeneticSpores, FungalTranscription FactorsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMEC1 protein, S cerevisiaeMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11NDT80 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRAD17 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID39652586
PMCPMC11658708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.