Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39652521›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Laws for health and care worker protection and rights: A study of 182 countries.

Matthew M Kavanagh, Adi Radakrishnan, Vishakh Unnikrishnan, Giorgio Cometto, Catherine Kane, Eric A Friedman, Varsha Srivatsan, Luis Gil Abinader, James Campbell, Health & Care Worker Policy Lab

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthew M KavanaghDepartment of Global Health, Georgetown University School of Health, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1751-4828
Adi RadakrishnanCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5186-9813
Vishakh UnnikrishnanCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4065-2297
Giorgio ComettoHealth Workforce Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Catherine KaneHealth Workforce Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2179-9378
Eric A FriedmanCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Varsha SrivatsanCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5752-2770
Luis Gil AbinaderCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
James CampbellHealth Workforce Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Health & Care Worker Policy Lab

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unprecedented and multi-faceted challenges health and care workers faced during the COVID-19 pandemic inspired the world's health ministers to call for a new Global Health and Care Worker Compact at the 74th World Health Assembly in 2021. The Care Compact identifies key areas where governments can use law and policy to prevent harm, provide support, ensure inclusivity, and safeguard rights of health and care workers toward improving population health. Using policy surveillance methods, we conducted an empirical analysis of the national law and policy environments on health and care workers' protection and rights in 182 countries. Across 10 indicators, 1,262 laws and policies were identified and analyzed for their alignment with the international legal standards. Analysis shows significant gaps. 62% of all national laws are aligned. Nearly every country has multiple areas where national laws are not yet aligned with the Care Compact. Though alignment is feasible. In 5 of 6 regions at least one country has laws aligned on all indicators. Geographic region was not a significant predictor of alignment, while income level was only weakly associated. Comparing the key legal issues facing health and care workers, well over half of countries studied are fully aligned with the Care Compact on occupational health and safety, fair remuneration, enabling work environments, freedom of association, and collective bargaining. Approximately 50% of countries studied are fully aligned on protections against violence and harassment in the workplace and whistleblower protections. But less than 25% are fully aligned on access to health services in occupational settings and equal treatment and non-discrimination. Together this analysis highlights the need for, and opportunity of, law reform in countries throughout the world to elevate and protect the rights and well-being of health and care workers and, in doing so, improve health systems.

Identifiers

PMID39652521
PMCPMC11627435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.