Observational studyJAMA network open2024
Weekly Cisplatin Cycles and Outcomes for Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Cancer.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional immune profiling uncovers biphasic peripheral T-cell dynamics after chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.Oncoimmunology · 2026Article
- Article
- Advancing Head and Neck Cancer Therapies: From Conventional Treatments to Emerging Strategies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend weekly cisplatin as an alternative concurrent systemic therapy for definitive chemoradiation in patients with head and neck cancer. However, the impact of different levels of adherence to weekly cisplatin on outcomes stratified by human papillomavirus p16 status remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association between the number of weekly cisplatin cycles and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, observational, single-institution cohort study at The Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center included patients with a diagnosis of nonmetastatic head and neck cancer between December 1, 2011, and March 30, 2020, who received chemoradiation. Data analysis was performed between March and May 2024. Exposure: A total of 5, 6, or 7 to 8 weekly cisplatin cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure (LRF), and distant failure (DF). Cox multivariable analysis was performed for variables associated with OS and PFS, and Fine-Gray multivariable analysis was performed for variables associated with LRF and DF. Results: A total of 142 patients met the criteria (119 men [83.8%]; median [IQR] age, 59 [54-63] years). Median (IQR) follow-up was 46.8 (40.8-55.6) months. Among 92 patients with reasons for cisplatin interruption reported, the most common reason was low blood counts (42 patients [45.7%]). Those who missed weekly cisplatin cycles had worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.22; 95% CI, 1.19-4.17; P = .01) and PFS (aHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06-3.15; P = .03) than those who received 7 to 8 cycles. Cancer control outcomes were comparable between these groups (LRF aHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.15-1.93; P = .34; DF aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.60-3.82; P = .38). Patients with p16-negative tumors who missed weekly cisplatin cycles had worse OS (for every missing cisplatin cycle, aHR, 11.34, 1.51-84.94; P = .02) than those treated with 7 to 8 cycles. However, for those with p16-positive tumors, there were no statistically significant differences in OS between those who missed weekly cisplatin cycles vs others who received 7 to 8 cycles (aHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.47-3.14; P = .69). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with head and neck cancer who received definitive chemoradiation, those with p16-negative tumors who missed weekly cisplatin cycles had lower OS than those who received 7 to 8 cycles, although OS was comparable between these groups for p16-positive tumors. Cytopenia represented the most common reason for cisplatin interruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.