ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Patient-Perceived Physician Bias in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS).
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding Social Drivers of Health, Burden, and Impact of Hidradenitis Suppurativa among Different Racial and Ethnic Groups in the USA.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating and understudied inflammatory skin disease that disproportionately impacts Black Americans. The objective of this study was to explore the role that race and ethnicity may play in HS patients' perceptions of physician bias and their care quality. We administered a cross-sectional anonymous online survey to individuals with HS from June 13 to 30, 2021. Items from the Commonwealth Fund 2001 Health Care Quality Survey were employed to evaluate whether participants felt they were judged based on their race or ethnicity. Data was analyzed utilizing the test of equal or given proportions for assessing statistical significance with a threshold p-value < 0.05. The survey received a total of 1040 responses. The cohort was majority female and racially and ethnically diverse, with participants from six continents. Overall, 15.2% (136/894) of respondents reported feeling that they would receive better care if they were of a different race/ethnicity, and 13.6% (122/894) felt their primary HS provider treated them unfairly based on their race. Participants who belonged to minority groups more often reported feeling that they would receive better medical care if they were of a different race/ethnicity and felt that they were treated unfairly due to their race/ethnicity compared to White participants. These findings highlight the need to better understand the complex systemic and interpersonal factors at play in interactions between HS patients and healthcare providers to ensure that patients can receive much-needed care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.