ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Aquaphotomics study of fresh cannabis inflorescence: near infrared spectral analysis of water matrix structures.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aquaphotomics is an approach that describes the water-light interactions in aqueous solutions or biological systems and retrieves information about the nature of the underlying water-related interactions. We evaluated the water spectral pattern (WASP) and water matrix structure of freshly harvested cannabis inflorescence from seven different chemovars using near-infrared (NIR) spectral data coupled with chemometric models. Six activated water bands-1342, 1364, 1384, 1412, 1440, and 1462 nm, occurred consistently in all of the spectrum exploration steps as well as in the partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) steps. However, according to major class and chemovar aquagram values, the largest spectral variation was associated with the following bands: 1412, 1364, 1374, 1384, 1488, and 1512 nm. A strong positive correlation between 1364, 1374, and 1384 nm aquagram values and a strong negative correlation between 1412 and 1512 nm aquagram values were observed through all aquagram analysis steps. These water activated bands were found to serve as good discriminators and classifiers according to either major class or chemovar. Furthermore, significant differences in the water matrix structure of different cannabis chemovars were observed, with the highest variations associated with the presence of free water molecules, small molecule solvation shells, extent of strongly bound water, and the number of hydrogen bonds per water molecule. Minor cannabinoids and terpenes such as cannabigerolic acid and (-)-guaiol displayed relatively high correlations with these bands. The results of this study suggest that the most accurate way to explore the cannabis inflorescence water matrix spectral pattern is by chemovars and not by major classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.