ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2024
Influence of DPYD gene polymorphisms on 5-Fluorouracil toxicities in Thai colorectal cancer patients.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Pharmacogenomic Basis for Tolerance of 5-Fluorouracil Following Early, Severe Toxicity from Capecitabine in a CDA Ultrarapid Metabolizer Colon Cancer Patient: A Case Report.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Association between miRNA expression profiles and polymorphisms of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase drug-metabolizing gene in patients with colorectal cancer receiving 5-fluorouracil.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DPYD polymorphisms have been widely found to be related to 5-FU-induced toxicities. The aim of this study was to establish significant associations between five single-nucleotide polymorphisms of DPYD and 5-FU hematological toxicities in Thai colorectal cancer patients. The toxicities were analyzed at the first and second cycles of 5-FU administration in 75 patients. Genotyping was performed using TaqMan real-time PCR. The genotype frequencies of DPYD*2A,1905 + 1 G > A and DPYD 1774 C > T were all wild type. The frequencies of genetic testing for DPYD*5, 1627 A > G, DPYD 1896T > C, and DPYD*9A, 85 A > G were 37.30% (AG; 34.60%, GG; 2.70%), 32.00% (TC; 25.30%, CC; 6.70%), and 13.40% (AG; 10.70%, GG; 2.70%), respectively. The results reveal significant findings with neutropenia occurring in 100% (2/2) of the patients with homozygous variant DPYD*9A (GG) from the first cycle of treatment for both Grade 1-4 and Grade 3-4 toxicities (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001 respectively). DPYD *9A was related to Grade 1-4 leukopenia (P = 0.001) and both Grade 1-4 and severe thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) in the first cycle. In the second cycle, DPYD*5 was shown to be closely associated with no Grade 1-4 toxicity (P = 0.02). However, we found that 100% (2/2) of patients carrying the homozygous variant (GG) DPYD*5, presented no significant toxicity, so, DPYD*5 may be a predictive marker of neutropenia in patients treated with 5-FU. These outcomes suggest that there may be an increased risk of developing 5-FU-induced neutropenia in patients carrying the DPYD*9A, which should be considered as part of the standard procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.