ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
New virtual contrast enhancement boost technique can reduce the dose of intravenous contrast medium used in computer tomography angiography of the abdominal aorta.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vendor-agnostic versus vendor-specific boost methods in low-concentration contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to evaluate the image quality of computed tomography (CT) angiograms obtained using a virtual contrast augmentation technique, adding an iodine map to the contrast-enhanced images, obtained through a digital subtraction technique, reducing the dose of intravenous iodinated contrast medium compared to the conventional institutional standard technique.
methodsThis prospective investigation enrolled patients previously diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysms, who underwent two successive computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) of the aorta. One CTA was performed employing the virtual contrast enhancement boost technique with a 40% decrease in the intravenous contrast medium dose, while the other adhered to the conventional protocol without any reduction in contrast medium volume. After imaging, both qualitative and quantitative assessments were conducted to evaluate the opacification level of the aorta and its branching vessels.
resultsThe study analyzed 28 examinations from 14 subjects (two per participant). Qualitative analysis revealed that image quality was deemed adequate for diagnostic purposes, with nearly all arterial segments in both protocols rated as good or excellent. Although no statistically significant differences were detected, the average attenuation across all arterial segments in the angiograms exhibited a trend towards higher values in the virtual contrast enhancement boost technique, compared to the conventional protocol. Similarly, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) demonstrated comparable levels between the two methodologies.
conclusionThe application of virtual contrast enhancement in the acquisition of CT angiograms of the aorta maintains comparable image quality, while reducing the dosage of intravenous contrast medium by 40%. This approach suggests a potential for optimizing contrast use in vascular imaging, aligning with goals related to patient safety and radiological efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39652179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.