ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Patient centered outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea: a retrospective analysis.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Innovations and Evolving Technologies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery of the base of the tongue vs. conservative treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, a RCT, the RAPID study protocol.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeObstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is usually caused by collapse of the base of tongue (BOT) and impacts patients' overall health. Despite current conventional therapies, some patients do not achieve satisfactory results. Reduction of BOT using Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) emerges as a promising treatment. We evaluated the patient reported and clinical outcomes of TORS for OSA.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated from 2018 to 2021 in a non-academic general hospital. Patients were eligible for TORS when apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was >5 in combination with obstruction at BOT level. Patients were included when 1-year follow up respiratory polygraphy was available. Changes in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-35), MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores and postoperative complications were evaluated. Surgical success rates were obtained.
resultsOut of 56 patients, 28 patients of which 22 (78.6%) males and 6 (21.4%) females, with OSA severity ranging from mild to severe and mean age of 49 (SD 11.8) with a median BMI of 28.1 (IQR 26.9-32.1) were included. ESS score declined from mean 5.9 (SD 3.8) to 2.2 (SD 2.0) (p<0.00). FOSQ-35 scores were all declined (p<0.05). MDADI scores were in normal range (80-100) and remained stable (p = 0.44). In 23 (82.1%) patients no postoperative complications were observed. Surgical success rates were 86%.
conclusionsTORS demonstrate to be effective and safe in OSA patients, and it can be used in both patients who are unresponsive to conventional therapies or as a primary therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39652134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.