ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Barnidipine as a potential alternative treatment for Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis: a retrospective pilot study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cold responses and hormonal echoes: a comprehensive view of Raynaud's vascular dysfunction.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess short-term barnidipine efficacy and tolerability on Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)-Raynaud's phenomenon (RP).
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients with SSc starting barnidipine 10 mg/day. Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) and mean blood pressure (MBP) were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Discontinuation rates and adverse events (AEs) were compared with retrospectively evaluated patients who started MR-nifedipine 20 mg/day at our centre.
resultsSixty-four patients (29 barnidipine, 35 MR-nifedipine) were evaluated. Most patients starting barnidipine had a previous CCB exposure (69%; 57.9% of these were withdrawn for AEs). During follow-up, RCS decreased significantly (6.6 ± 1.8 vs 4.4 ± 1.8, p < 0.001), while the MBP did not change significantly (86.4 ± 8.4 vs 85 ± 7.3 mmHg; p = 0.36). Nine patients (31%) discontinued barnidipine during the follow-up (AEs 6/9, inefficacy 3/9). Previous CCB failure did not predict barnidipine withdrawal (OR = 0.188 95%CI [0.02-1.8]; p = 0.147). No predictors of barnidipine withdrawal were found, and no clinical or demographic differences were found between patients withdrawing and continuing barnidipine. The 6-month retention rates of barnidipine and MR-nifedipine did not differ significantly (69 vs 80%; log-rank p = 0.23), and the two groups had a similar incidence of AEs leading to discontinuation (20.1 vs 17%; p = 0.48).
conclusionsBarnidipine could be an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option to treat SSc-RP, even in patients previously failing other CCBs. Key Points • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) currently represent the first-line treatment for Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to Systemic Sclerosis (SSc-RP). However, little data exists about using novel CCBs, such as barnidipine, in this condition. • This study retrospectively evaluated patients with SSc-RP treated with barnidipine to assess its short-term efficacy. To serve as a control group for tolerability, we retrospectively compared these patients with others starting modified release-nifedipine (MR-nifedipine). • In patients treated with barnidipine, we observed a significant decrease in Raynaud's condition score at the 6-month follow-up without substantial changes in mean blood pressure. • The proportion of adverse events and drug withdrawal rate between patients starting barnidipine and MR-nifedipine did not differ significantly, even in patients starting barnidipine after previously failing other CCBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39652122What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.