Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39652111›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Exploring the role of health-related quality of life measures in predictive modelling for oncology: a systematic review.

T G W van der Heijden, K M de Ligt, N J Hubel, S van der Mierden, B Holzner, L V van de Poll-Franse, B H de Rooij, EORTC Quality of Life Group

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Baseline functioning scales of quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) as a predictor of overall survival in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predicting health-related quality of life two years post-diagnosis across seven cancer types: using machine learning to identify vulnerable patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T G W van der HeijdenDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.vd.heijden@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6693-5146
K M de LigtDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9218-617X
N J HubelUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5501-1583
S van der MierdenScientific Information Service, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-1872
B HolznerUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-3621
L V van de Poll-FranseDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-6872
B H de RooijNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0172-0857
EORTC Quality of Life Group

Funding

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLG 007-2022 (EORTC 205)Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint undertaking Health Outcomes Observatory (H2O) No 945345-2.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is increasingly assessed in oncology research and routine care, which has led to the inclusion of HRQoL in prediction models. This review aims to describe the current state of oncological prediction models incorporating HRQoL. A systematic literature search for the inclusion of HRQoL in prediction models in oncology was conducted. Selection criteria were a longitudinal study design and inclusion of HRQoL data in prediction models as predictor, outcome, or both. Risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST tool and quality of reporting was scored with an adapted TRIPOD reporting guideline. From 4747 abstracts, 98 records were included in this review. High risk of bias was found in 71% of the publications. HRQoL was mainly incorporated as predictor (78% (55% predictor only, 23% both predictor and outcome)), with physical functioning and symptom domains selected most frequently as predictor. Few models (23%) predicted HRQoL domains by other or baseline HRQoL domains. HRQoL was used as outcome in 21% of the publications, with a focus on predicting symptoms. There were no difference between AI-based (16%) and classical methods (84%) in model type selection or model performance when using HRQoL data. This review highlights the role of HRQoL as a tool in predicting disease outcomes. Prediction of and with HRQoL is still in its infancy as most of the models are not fully developed. Current models focus mostly on the physical aspects of HRQoL to predict clinical outcomes, and few utilize AI-based methods.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeHumansForecastingOncologyPrediction modelQuality of lifeReview

Identifiers

PMID39652111
PMCPMC11865133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.