ArticleDysphagia2025
Cranial Nerve Deficits Predict Pharyngeal Phase Swallowing Impairment in Patients with Neurogenic Dysphagia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The examination of the cranial nerves (CN) provides an accurate analysis of facial-oral integrity, motility and sensitivity that is fundamental to understanding swallowing efficiency. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to verify whether the assessment of CN can provide information on the amount and location of pharyngeal residue and risk of aspiration in patients with neurogenic dysphagia. A total of 96 dysphagic patients have been enrolled. Pharyngeal residue was assessed by the Italian version of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (IT-YPRSRS) and presence of penetration/aspiration using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) during Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES), while CNs were evaluated using the I&I test. Logistic regression models were used to investigate causal associations; for each of the CN found to be significant, the optimal cut-off to best discriminate healthy patients from those with pathology was calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using R software with the significance level set at P < 0.05. Significant correlations were found between total scores on the I&I test and the PAS and IT-YPRSRS results. Impairment of CN VII was a sensitive and specific predictor of vallecular residue. Deficits of V CN and X CN were predictors of pyriform sinus residue. PAS scores were just below the statistical significance. Assessing CN can provide specific pathophysiological information about pharyngeal residue and risk of penetration/aspiration. These findings could help clinicians understand swallowing issues and early plan targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39652100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.