ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2024
Acetate Shock Loads Enhance CO Uptake Rates of Anaerobic Microbiomes.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial drivers of Black Soldier Fly biowaste valorization: from microbiome functions to scalable insect-microbe systems.AIMS microbiology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of lab-defined syngas and acetate as substrates for HApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Guiding Microbial Crossroads: Syngas-Driven Valorisation of Anaerobic-Digestion Intermediates into Bio-Hydrogen and Volatile Fatty Acids.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass commonly produces syngas, a mixture of gases such as CO, CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.