Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39651630›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2024

Spatiotemporal Monitoring of Cropland Soil Organic Carbon Changes From Space.

Tom Broeg, Axel Don, Martin Wiesmeier, Thomas Scholten, Stefan Erasmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tom BroegThünen Earth Observation (ThEO), Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2078-0441
Axel DonThünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7046-3332
Martin WiesmeierBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Institute for Agroecology and Organic Farming, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3981-5461
Thomas ScholtenDepartment of Geosciences, Soil Science and Geomorphology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4875-2602
Stefan ErasmiThünen Earth Observation (ThEO), Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6393-6071

Funding

Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil monitoring requires accurate and spatially explicit information on soil organic carbon (SOC) trends and changes over time. Spatiotemporal SOC models based on Earth Observation (EO) satellite data can support large-scale SOC monitoring but often lack sufficient temporal validation based on long-term soil data. In this study, we used repeated SOC samples from 1986 to 2022 and a time series of multispectral bare soil observations (Landsat and Sentinel-2) to model high-resolution cropland SOC trends for almost four decades. An in-depth validation of the temporal model uncertainty and accuracy of the derived SOC trends was conducted based on a network of 100 long-term monitoring sites that were continuously resampled every 5 years. While the general SOC prediction accuracy was high (R

Indexed as

CarbonEnvironmental MonitoringSoilAgricultureCrops, AgriculturalModels, TheoreticalSpatio-Temporal AnalysisCarbonSoilbare soilcarbon sequestrationchange detectionclimate changeearth observationremote sensingsoil reflectance compositespace–time model

Identifiers

PMID39651630
PMCPMC11626691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.