Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39651455›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities.

Ludovic Hernandez, Laure Parent, Victoire Molinier, Bertrand Suc, Françoise Izar, Elisabeth Moyal, Jean-Marie Peron, Philippe Otal, Amélie Lusque, Anouchka Modesto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ludovic HernandezDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Laure ParentDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Victoire MolinierDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Bertrand SucDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Françoise IzarDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Elisabeth MoyalDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Jean-Marie PeronDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Philippe OtalDepartment of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Amélie LusqueBiostatistics Unit, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Anouchka ModestoDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic option in the guidelines for liver primaries after standard strategies like surgery or thermoablation have failed. To assess its efficacy and safety, we reviewed all patients treated by SBRT for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over a six-year period. Methods and materials: The study included all patients treated by SBRT for HCC between April 2015 and November 2021 in the University Cancer Institute at Toulouse-Oncopole. All patients were inoperable and not eligible for thermoablation, or after a failure. All tumor sizes were included and cirrhosis up to Child-Pugh B was accepted. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment response was assessed using mRECIST criteria. Toxicity was graded using CTCAE (v4.0). Results: One hundred and nine patients with 118 lesions were treated. Half underwent prior standard treatment. Median dose was 50 Grays in five fractions for most patients. Chronic liver disease represented 90.8 % of cases with a median age of 69 years. Median tumor size was 4.0 cm. Median follow-up was 22.2 months [95 %CI: 15.1-30.4]. LC, OS and PFS at two years were 82.4 % [95 %CI: 71.3; 89.5], 73.2 % [95 %CI: 61.5; 81.8] and 35.8 % [95 %CI: 25.1; 46.7], respectively. Acute toxicities occurred in 20.2 % of patients, including 10.1 % grade 3-4 and 1.8 % grade 5. Late toxicities occurred in 5.5 % of patients including 4.6 % grade 3-4. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was related to digestive perforation or liver failure. Conclusion: SBRT provides good LC with an acceptable safety profile. It can be used in several settings such as salvage therapy or in combination with validated treatment. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate SBRT as a standard alternative.

Indexed as

EfficacyHepatocellular carcinomaLocal ControlSafetyStereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID39651455
PMCPMC11625365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.