ArticleHeart rhythm O22024
Needle-free atrial transseptal access: A safe and reproducible alternative for left atrial catheterization.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Left atrial catheterization is a common procedure in electrophysiology labs to treat arrhythmogenic substrates on the left side of the heart. Needle transseptal puncture is the standard approach, but it can lead to complications related to device design or operator technique. To reduce these complications, needle-free alternatives have been explored. Objective: This study aims to report the first multicenter application of the needle-free transseptal access (NeFTA) approach, assessing its safety and efficacy in patients undergoing electrophysiological procedures. Methods: This retrospective, observational multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the NeFTA approach in patients undergoing ablation of left arrhythmogenic substrates across 3 electrophysiology centers in Mexico. NeFTA uses only a guidewire, without a needle or sharp guidewire. The sheath, with a dilator, is guided into the fossa ovalis under fluoroscopic guidance, using anterior force and clockwise torque to allow the guidewire to puncture the septum with minimal risk. Results: The NeFTA technique was used in 366 patients. Most sheaths were deflectable, with nondeflectable sheaths in 43.4% of cases. Left atrial access via NeFTA was successful in 96.18% of cases, with pericardial effusion as the only complication (0.55% rate). Conclusion: This technique was reproducible and safe, achieving successful access on the first or second attempt in 96.18% of cases, regardless of the operator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.