ArticleHeart rhythm O22024
Ventricular arrhythmias after atrial fibrillation electrical cardioversion: A multicenter study.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation: executive summary of the German Cardiac Society position paper].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025Review
- Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia After Cardioversion for AF with Tachycardia-induced Cardiomyopathy.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) after atrial fibrillation (AF) electrical cardioversion (ECV) have been reported. Objective: We sought to assess incidence, timing, and clinical characteristics of patients with post-AF ECV-related VAs. Methods: Multicenter observational retrospective study including 13 centers, incorporating patients with VAs or sudden cardiac death within 10 days of ECV. The total number of ECVs performed during the collecting period was provided. Patients with pre-ECV VAs were excluded. Results: Twenty-three patients with VAs were identified out of 11,897 AF ECVs performed in 13 centers during a median 2-year period, suggesting post-ECV VA incidence of 0.2%. The patients' mean age was 71 ± 11 years, and 13 (56.5%) were female. AF duration prior to ECV was 71 ± 54 days. Congestive heart failure and hypertension were both found in 17 (74%) patients. QT-prolonging drugs were used by 17 (74%). Index VA occurred 28.5 (interquartile range 5.5-72) hours post-ECV, including torsades de pointes, nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, and sudden cardiac death in 17 (74%), 5 (22%), and 1 (4%) patient, respectively. Post-ECV heart rate was slower and QT duration longer compared with pre-ECV (57 ± 11 beats/min vs 113 ± 270 beats/min; Conclusion: VAs post-AF ECV are rare, occur within 3 to 72 hours post-ECV, and are potentially fatal. Our study gives a signal of caution favoring prolonged monitoring in small subset of patients as congestive heart failure patients treated with class III antiarrhythmic drugs, with post-ECV bradycardia, especially (but not exclusively) when QT prolongation noted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.