Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39651321›Full record

ArticleNutrition research and practice2024

Evaluating the effectiveness of a food literacy pilot program for university students: using a mixed-methods research approach.

Eunji Ko, Eunjin Jang, Jiwon Sim, Minjeong Jeong, Sohyun Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eunji KoDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-1007
Eunjin JangDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-4575
Jiwon SimDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2381-8641
Minjeong JeongDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0686-1666
Sohyun ParkDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6009-1002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesAs awareness of climate change increases, the relevance of environmental education in dietary choices gains prominence. Although diversely defined, food literacy (FL) is increasingly recognized as the ability to make food choices with an awareness of environmental sustainability. This study aims to conduct a pilot implementation and assess the effectiveness of a program developed to improve FL among university students. SUBJECTS/

methodsThe study spanned from August 2022 to February 2023, involving 92 participants (42 in the intervention group and 50 in the control group). Over 11 weeks, the program included cooking classes, local farm visits, and environmental impact lectures developed through extensive literature reviews and interviews with students and experts. FL was measured using a 33-item survey along with basic sociodemographic factors. After the intervention, both groups participated in qualitative interviews. All statistical analyses were carried out in Stata/SE version 17.0, and interview data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel using the framework analysis method.

resultsThe FL scores of the intervention group improved significantly from an average of 65.8 to 69.6 points (

conclusionThis pilot program effectively enhanced some aspects of FL-related knowledge of participants. High satisfaction among participants and no dropouts indicated its potential for scaling. Future programs will benefit from strategies that facilitate the transition from educational improvement to practical application.

Indexed as

climate changeFoodintervention studyliteracyyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID39651321
PMCPMC11621428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.