Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39651256›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Renovating the Barnes maze for mouse models of Dementia with STARR FIELD: A 4-day protocol that probes learning rate, retention and cognitive flexibility.

Aimee Bertolli, Oday Halhouli, Yiming Liu-Martínez, Brianna Blaine, Ramasamy Thangavel, Qiang Zhang, Eric Emmons, Nandakumar S Narayanan, Serena B Gumusoglu, Joel C Geerling and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aimee BertolliDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.ORCID 0009-0005-0595-1125
Oday HalhouliDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-9385-2840
Yiming Liu-MartínezDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.ORCID 0009-0001-5374-3014
Brianna BlaineUniversity of Iowa Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa.
Ramasamy ThangavelDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-5006-7914
Qiang ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-4746-0392
Eric EmmonsDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-5351-5073
Nandakumar S NarayananDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-0427-0003
Serena B GumusogluUniversity of Iowa Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-2098-388X
Joel C GeerlingDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-9956-4006
Georgina M AldridgeDepartment of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-8025-1189

Funding

Cortical Alpha-Synuclein in DementiaR01NS129711 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Georgina Aldridge · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land-based mazes that require spatial cues to identify the location of a hiding-place are a low-stress method to evaluate learning rate and memory retention in mice. One version, the Barnes maze, allows quantification of naturalistic exploratory behaviors not evident in water-based tasks. As the task relies on innate behaviors, it does not require overtraining, making it more feasible to examine early learning and non-memory executive functions that are characteristic of some non-amnestic dementias. However, because it is difficult to hide odor cues in the traditional version of the maze, learning rate during individual trials can be difficult to interpret. We designed and tested the use of 3D-printed escape shuttles that can be made in duplicate, as well as a docking tunnel that allows mice to self-exit the maze to improve reproducibility and limit experimenter influence. In combination with maze turning and escape tunnel caps, we show our shuttles mitigate the possibility of undesired cues. We then compare use of our 4-day protocol across several mouse models of cognitive impairment. We demonstrate an additional stage, the STARR protocol (Spatial Training and Rapid Reversal), to better challenge executive functions such as working memory and behavioral flexibility. We examine commonly used outcome measures across mice with and without access to spatial cues, as well as across mouse models of cognitive impairment to demonstrate the use of our 4-day protocol. Overall, this protocol provides detailed instructions to build and perform a robust spatial maze that can help expand the range of deficits identified. Our findings will aid in interpretation of traditional protocols, as well as provide an updated method to screen for both amnestic and non-amnestic cognitive changes.

Indexed as

agingbehavioral flexibilityexecutive functionlong term memorymazeneurodegenerationnormal pressure hydrocephalusperseveranceperseverationradial armshort term memorytraumatic brain injuryworking memory

Identifiers

PMID39651256
PMCPMC11623659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.