ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A shared theta-rhythmic process for selective sampling of environmental information and internally stored information.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective attention is the collection of mechanisms through which the brain preferentially processes behaviorally important information. Many everyday tasks, such as shopping for groceries, require selective sampling (i.e., attention-related sampling) of both external information (i.e., information from the environment) and internally stored information (i.e., information being maintained in working memory). While there is clear evidence that selective sampling of external information is influenced by internally stored information (and vice versa), the extent to which selective sampling of external and internal information share neural resources remains a focus of debate. Previous research has linked theta-rhythmic (3-8 Hz) neural activity in higher-order (e.g., frontal cortices) and sensory regions to theta-rhythmic changes in behavioral performance during selective sampling. Here, we used EEG and a dual-task design (i.e., a task that required both external and internal information), in male and female humans, to directly compare theta-dependent fluctuations in behavioral performance during external sampling with those during internal sampling. Our findings are consistent with a shared theta-rhythmic process for selectively sampling external information or internal information. This theta-rhythmic sampling is associated with both phase-dependent changes in sensory responses (i.e., as measured with the N1 component) and phase-dependent changes in interactions between external and internal information. The theta phase associated with weaker sensory responses and relatively worse behavioral performance (i.e., the 'bad' phase) is also associated with a slowed perceptual decision-making process (as measured with the CPP component), specifically during dual-task trials when to-be-detected external information matches to-be-remembered internal information. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Most everyday tasks require information from both the external environment and internal memory stores; however, the extent to which selective processing of external and internal information rely on shared neural mechanisms and resources remains a subject of debate. Recent work has demonstrated attention-related, theta-rhythmic fluctuations (3-8 Hz) in neural activity and behavioral performance, perhaps reflecting the temporal coordination of competing functions (e.g., attention-related sampling and shifting). Here, we used EEG and a dual-task design to provide evidence of a shared, theta-rhythmic process for alternately boosting the sampling of either external or internal information. This shared, theta-rhythmic process also modulates interactions between external and internal information on dual-task trials, when these sources of information compete for limited processing resources.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.