ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2024
Early postoperative outcomes of modified del Nido cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with low ejection fraction.
Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging assessment of Del Nido versus cold blood cardioplegia in patients with low ejection fraction undergoing combined coronary artery bypass graft and mitral valve replacement: Early outcomes.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026Article
- Alternative Base Solutions for del Nido Cardioplegia: Composition, Rationale, and Clinical Evidence.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the intraoperative and early postoperative effects of modified del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) compared to classic blood cardioplegia (BC) in patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: A total of 123 patients (108 males, 15 females; mean age: 62.2±8.5 years; range, 42 to 78 years) with an EF of 35% or lower who underwent on-pump CABG were included in the retrospective study between December 2022 and December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of cardioplegia used: Group 1 (n=74) was designated as the BC group, and Group 2 (n=49) was designated as the DNC group. The groups were compared in terms of aortic cross-clamp duration, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration, need for defibrillation during weaning from CPB, positive inotrope requirement, intra-aortic balloon pump requirement, postoperative troponin-I levels, postoperative atrial fibrillation occurence, postoperative prolonged ventilation, development of postoperative neurologic complications, need for reintervention due to postoperative bleeding, postoperative transfusion requirement, and EF values at one month after the operation. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in the terms of aortic cross-clamp and CPB duration (p=0.955 Conclusion: In patients who underwent CABG with reduced EF, modified DNC provided myocardial protection comparable to classic BC. Additionally, the need for intraoperative defibrillation and postoperative inotropic agents, as well as the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, were lower in patients operated with DNC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.