ArticleCureus2024
Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumor of Undetermined Malignant Potential (STUMP): A Diagnostic Challenge.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postmenopausal Enlargement of a Presumed Leiomyoma Revealing STUMP: A Diagnostic Pitfall with Important Clinical Implications-A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smooth muscle tumors of the uterus can range from benign leiomyoma (LM) to malignant leiomyosarcoma (LMS) histologically. Between these two entities lies a gray zone of smooth muscle tumors of undetermined malignant potential, commonly known as STUMP. Their diagnosis has always been a challenge for the pathologists. Once diagnosed, clinicians face difficulties in managing STUMP because of the lack of discrete treatment guidelines. Here, we report a case of a 52-year-old lady who presented in an emergency with severe menorrhagia. On examination, the patient was pale and there was a 4x3 cm size polyp protruding through the internal ostium. Hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy and polypectomy were done. The polypectomy specimen was diagnosed as STUMP after a thorough histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The specimen was re-examined in two other reputed institutes, as there was a dilemma between the diagnosis of STUMP/leiomyosarcoma. The patient was treated with a radical hysterectomy, considering the upstaged diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma. The final histopathological diagnosis of the hysterectomy specimen was STUMP. The patient did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Presently, she is on follow-up every six months and has not developed any recurrence till now. The aim of reporting this case is to enrich the existing literature on this rare diagnosis and highlight the fact that STUMP can also present as a uterine polyp. This is probably the first case of STUMP presenting as a uterine polyp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.