ReviewCureus2024
Effectiveness of Telehealth in Obstetric and Gynecologic Care: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telehealth applications are growing in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. Strong scientific analysis and clinical recommendations are necessary for these innovative advancements. The purpose of this study was to conduct a thorough evaluation of how telehealth interventions can enhance obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes. Using pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria, we searched the literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. 968 pertinent research articles were found in these databases, and Endnote software checked them for duplication. Only fifty-two of these articles were deemed relevant after a thorough text examination. Every study that was included had its risk of bias evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Overall, telehealth interventions enhanced breastfeeding and smoking cessation obstetric outcomes. While preserving mother and fetal outcomes, telehealth interventions reduced the requirement for high-risk obstetric monitoring office visits. According to one study, women with gestational hypertension had lower rates of preeclampsia diagnoses. For continued use of injectable and oral contraceptives, telehealth treatments proved successful; one text-based study discovered higher rates of oral contraception after six months. When medication abortion services were provided via telehealth, access to early abortion was enhanced, and clinical outcomes were comparable to those of in-person care. Few studies have indicated the value of telehealth in improving the notification of test results for sexually transmitted infections and in improving the symptoms of urine incontinence with app-based interventions. Early availability of medical abortion services, breastfeeding, perinatal smoking cessation, telehealth therapies, and high-risk obstetrics schedule optimization were all linked to better obstetric outcomes. More carefully planned research is required to look at these and other interventions in order to produce data that can guide choices regarding the integration of more recent telehealth technology into obstetrics and gynecology practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.